Thaler has tried several times to copyright an image “as a work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity Machine,” which would have listed the author as the creator of the work and Thaler as the artwork’s owner, You can also read about how to get in touch with us. he was repeatedly rejected.
After the Office’s final rejection last year, Thaler sued the Office, claiming its denial was “arbitrary, capricious … and not in accordance with the law,” but Judge Howell didn’t see it that way. In her decision, Judge Howell writes that no copyright was ever granted for a work. “absent any guiding human hand,” Add to that “human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright.”
That’s been borne out in past cases cited by the judge, like that one involving a A monkey’s selfie To contrast, Judge Howell was noted a Case in point a Woman compiled a book from notebooks she’d filled with “words she believed were dictated to her” By: a Then, you can also check out the website for more information. “voice” It was worth copyright.
Judge Howell, though, did acknowledge the humanity of mankind “approaching new frontiers in copyright,” Where artists will use AI a Tool to create new works. She said that it would help her create. “challenging questions regarding how much human input is necessary” AI-created copyright artAI models often are trained using pre-existing data.
Stephen Thaler is planning to appeal. His attorney, Ryan Abbot of Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP, said, “We respectfully disagree with the court’s interpretation of the Copyright Act,” according to Bloomberg Law, This also reported a US Copyright Office statement saying it believed the court’s decision was the right one.
There is no way to predict the outcome of any given situation. US Copyright and AI are a hot topic, yet the number of court cases is increasing. Sarah Silverman and two other authors filed suit against OpenAI and Meta earlier this year over their models’ data scraping practices, for instance, while another lawsuit by programmer and lawyer Matthew Butterick alleges that data scraping by Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI amounted to software piracy.