When OpenAI’s board ousted CEO Sam Altman over a reported disagreement, claiming he was “not consistently candid,” it left many onlookers scratching their head. How might such a factor happen to one of the crucial buzzy startups in Silicon Valley? The shock firing highlighted the weird corporate construction on the $86 billion startup the place the nonprofit controls the for-profit subsidiary. This construction has drawn criticism from loads of tech characters together with Box CEO Aaron Levie. From tweets to the stage, Levie doubled down on his stance concerning OpenAI’s unorthodox construction at The Sunday Assessment‘s Brainstorm AI convention in San Francisco on Monday.

“If you just look at the ratio of the amount of drama to the amount of takeaways, the ratio is way off,” Levie stated on stage. “The main takeaway is, don’t have weird corporate structures. It never ends well.”

On the coronary heart of the dispute at OpenAI was a reported conflict of views on the trajectory of synthetic intelligence development. On one facet stood the efficient altruist faction, to which former board member Helen Toner subscribed, that worries a few doomsday-like state of affairs the place AI might destroy the world. On the opposing entrance there are efficient accelerationism (e/acc) fanatics, believing in AI’s potential to positively rework our world and advocating for an expedited growth. It wasn’t that black and white internally, however that appears to be the layman’s gist of the dispute.

Levie highlighted these two rising factions inside Silicon Valley, and whereas he leans extra in the direction of acceleration, he stated his largest takeaway from the philosophies is that we have to “land the plane as an ecosystem on this topic ASAP.” There’s “tens of thousands of products” that rely on OpenAI, giving rise to a group of corporations whose personal fortunes have develop into deeply entwined within the success of OpenAI.

Take Khan Academy founder Salman Khan, who described earlier Monday at Brainstorm AI, how his crew needed to attain out to “the highest levels of contacts” that they had at Microsoft to ensure that they wouldn’t have an interruption of service because of the boardroom drama.

Levie highlights this dependence as a key cause why a lot drama was kicked up, with so many figures rallying behind the success of OpenAI and Altman.

“It was not your classic sort of leadership struggle or dynamic,” Levie stated.

Subscribe to the Eye on AI publication to remain abreast of how AI is shaping the way forward for enterprise. Join free.